• If you currently own, previously owned or want to own an Avalanche, we welcome you to become a member today. Membership is FREE, register now!

GM PUSHES FOR VEHICLE-TO-VEHICLE STANDARDIZATION

enkeiavalanche

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2002
Messages
12,782
GM PUSHES FOR VEHICLE-TO-VEHICLE STANDARDIZATION

Vehicle-sensing technologies which could limit blind-spot collisions and deadly highway pileups have become a hot topic of discussion for automakers.  In particular, General Motors Corp. ?is calling for industry-wide communications standards to ensure those systems proliferate.?

The Federal Communications Commission recently dedicated a 5.9-gigahertz frequency for vehicle systems which broadcast between one another.  GM engineers recently demonstrated its vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) technology.  They say that industry collaboration ?is critical? if V2V applications are to be implemented into new vehicles.  The Crash Avoidance Metric Partners (CAMP) consortium was established by General Motors and Ford to create some standardization for such systems.  CAMP also includes DaimlerChrysler, Toyota Motor Corp., and Hyundai Motor Corp.

GM?s V2V system consists of a roof-mounted transponder, antenna, and communications chip.  It will enable a vehicle to ?broadcast its location and monitor the positions of hundreds of other cars with the same capability 10 times every second?.  The broadcast range is about 984 ft. which is about three times that of traditional radar.  Reporters present for the demonstration were prompted to drive a Cadillac CTS at 35 mph directly into the path of a parked CTS without touching the brakes.  As the approaching CTS drew closer to the parked car, a green vehicle icon on a dash-mounted monitor used to indicate the CTS? speed and the distance between vehicles turns to yellow.  At about 30 yards out, the icon turns red and the parked vehicles turn signals and brake lights flash in a rapid warning sequence.  A second later, the brakes seize control of the moving CTS and pull it to a stop 15 ft. short of the parked car.

The icon in this side mirror signals that a vehicle is in the left-side blind zone.



The V2V system is also able to alert a driver when a passing vehicle is approaching by flashing an amber caution light in the side mirror.  If a driver engages a turn signal, and there is a vehicle in his or her blind spot, the system sends a vibration through the driver?s seat.  The V2V system will determine whether or not to apply the brakes using algorithms that calculate the moving car?s speed and its time to impact.  The same algorithm can trigger the taillights to flash, cautioning an approaching vehicle against tailgating, potentially preventing pileups or chain-reaction rear-end collisions on congested roads. 

Although it may take 5 to 10 years before the technology is deployed widely, GM says that it may look into selling its V2V system as an aftermarket device, with a target price of $200.

Source: Scott Anderson, ?GM Pushing for V2V Standards?, WardsAuto.com.
 

Attachments

  • image_2_1004.jpg
    image_2_1004.jpg
    3 KB · Views: 244
Other than the blind zone detection in mirrors I guess this is still on the horizon. Blind zone detection will cost you about $45000 plus since it's availability is limited to higher end vehicles not the suggested 200 in the OP.
Took my wife shopping the past couple of weekends it's amazing that a 35000 plus Cadillac SRX doesn't even have Bluetooth.
 
About four years ago, I was working on a documentary film about gridlock - actually called "Gridlock".  We shot a number of different cars and trucks that were in a competition by an organization called DARPA.

This was a kind of a race around an old army base, where the various trucks and cars would drive themselves around the base - stopping at stop sighs, watching the street signals and the other traffic.  Totally amazing!  These are not remote controlled cars, but independent "thinking" cars!

The idea for the military - or at least one idea - would be to have a supply truck go from point A to point B with no risk to human life because no human is on board.  With traffic problems, one researcher said that you could get cars traveling at 150kph one inch apart, in complete safety.

And yeah, they did stick me in the back seat of one car with my camera, and me and the car went for a drive...

Michael
 
strange said:
With traffic problems, one researcher said that you could get cars traveling at 150kph one inch apart, in complete safety.

Michael

I don't believe this, the only way it can be true is to ASSUME that the only thing that needs to be considered is the computer controlled vehicles in the line and ASSUME that they wont malfunction.
 
Wasbro - one thing I can tell you about the automated cars we watched that day, and that was watching the first ever accident.  A lot of computer gearheads were amazed at this.

Mind you, it was very slow speed, but accident none the less.  Perhaps if all the cars were running the same OS, it would not be possible - I don't know.  But I do feel that I witnessed a bit of the future that morning...

Michael
 
Imagine what HACKERS would do with COmputer driven cars?
 
Oh God!  I never thought of hackers!  It's kind of funny - hacking a car? - but you're absolutely right.  They could kill somebody!

Working on that project for as long as I did, I never heard one person talking about that kind of problem.  I don't think it occurred to any of those scientists... 

You're good, YGMN!

Michael
 
Back
Top