Don't candy coat it, 'Vader. Tell us what you really think!lordvader said:The cladding for the AV is the most intense design attribute that has come from GM. ?It makes the AV what it is, the Ultimate Urban Assault Vehicle. ?Without it, ??I hate the look, makes me sick. ?GM should rethink the option for claddless AVs. ?If not, the truck should be called the 2003 AvaWhatInTheHellWasChevyThinking. ?
It's not even a true Silverado, since the box isn't separate from the cab; this rig has an identity crisis!gandolphxx said:That "thing" is just a Silverado Extended Cab Shortbed with a midgate - not a true AVALANCHE!![]()
Yeah, your right, still the Sub frame and unibody box - guess I just got grossed out and over reacted - still not that convinced, guess I am as bad as the 'Rado guys calling us B--- Ugly - sighSteelheadchaser said:It's not even a true Silverado, since the box isn't separate from the cab; this rig has an identity crisis!
Those weren't the accessories I was thinking about but good pointChief said:When it comes to accessories like bumper mounted winches, front receivers, etc. etc. etc. odds are the regular plain Jane Silverado components will slap right on to a claddingless Avalanche - that won't be the case for the units with cladding as we painfully know.
wrchism said:seems that all GM Silverados, Sub's, Tahoe's, and this new "naked Av" now share the same front end. ?
quote]
The Subs and Tahoes aren't getting the new front clip yet. They always seem to lag 1 -1 1/2 years behind that trucks in major styling changes.